"I always preserve all copies of Communications Today for reference for my entire team mates as it is a rich encyclopedia of communication information. I call...
Ashish
Director - IT, Bitscape IT Solutions
  • Home
  • Magazine
  • Contact us
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Tender Buzz

Magazine

Ezine
Current Issue
Magazine-Archive
News
News - Archive
Advertise with Us
Subscribe
Buy Latest Issue

Subscribe Newsletter


  
   
Home arrow Current Issue arrow Editorial: New Electronics Procurement Policy
Editorial: New Electronics Procurement Policy
Wednesday, 16 May 2012


The Union Cabinet has approved a proposal to give preference to domestically manufactured goods while procuring electronics goods that have security implications for the country. The concerned organizations will be required to specify the percentage of such procurement, which should not be less than 30 percent of the total value.

Reacting to the decision, The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), US-India Business Council (USIBC), and 32 other associations from the United States, Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, Hong Kong, and Korea have sent a letter to the Prime Minister to rescind the new rules, which are claimed to unfairly discriminate against foreign firms and potentially violate World Trade Organization agreements. Additionally, the TIA has sought support from Telecom Equipment Manufacturing Association (TEMA) in opposing the proposed preferential market access (PMA) policy. The PMA applies not only to government organizations but also to other purchases that have security implications for the country. PMA policy is likely to undermine the provision of affordable telecom services in India.

Additionally, the reserve price for the auction of spectrum as recommended by TRAI is being deemed as exorbitant by telecom operators. TRAI has proposed reserve pricing per MHz at `3622 crore for 1800 MHz, `14,000 crore for 700 MHz, and `7244 crore for 800/900 MHz. These recommendations are perceived to discourage investment in networks, restrict the growth of mobile services, and drive up consumer prices.

The passive infrastructure sector, including communication towers, will be subject to excise duty, which is excluded from Cenvat credit either as capital goods or as inputs. In a recent verdict in Bharti Airtel versus CCE, the Mumbai Tribunal has negated the claim for CENVAT credit on any part of the passive infrastructure used for providing mobile telephony services.

While the government's concern for national security is understandable, a balance needs to be struck between indigenously manufactured and imported electronics products to keep services affordable in the long term.

 
< Prev   Next >
[ Back ]
AVAYA
Frost & Sullivan: 2013 India ICT Awards
Frost & Sullivan: 2nd Annual India Mobile Broadband Summit 2013
MediaTek
CommunicAsia 2013
Aegis Graham Bell Awards 2013
22nd Convergence India Expo 2014

Contact us | Magazine Subscription | Advertise with Us | Careers | Site Map | About us
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Resources
© Copyright 2007, ADI Media Pvt. Ltd.-Telecommunication, Broadband & Networking Magazine Publishers